-
中文標準譯本
那麼,律法和神的各樣應許是對立的嗎?絕對不是!如果一個能使人得生命的律法被賜下,義就真是本於律法了。
-
新标点和合本
这样,律法是与神的应许反对吗?断乎不是!若曾传一个能叫人得生的律法,义就诚然本乎律法了。
-
和合本2010(上帝版-简体)
这样,律法是与上帝的应许对立吗?绝对不是!如果律法的颁布能使人得生命,义就诚然出于律法了。
-
和合本2010(神版-简体)
这样,律法是与神的应许对立吗?绝对不是!如果律法的颁布能使人得生命,义就诚然出于律法了。
-
当代译本
这样看来,上帝的律法和上帝的应许是否互相矛盾呢?当然不是!如果赐下的律法能带给人生命,人就可以靠律法成为义人了。
-
圣经新译本
这样,律法和神的应许是对立的吗?绝对不是。如果所赐下的律法能使人得生命,义就真的是出于律法了。
-
中文标准译本
那么,律法和神的各样应许是对立的吗?绝对不是!如果一个能使人得生命的律法被赐下,义就真是本于律法了。
-
新標點和合本
這樣,律法是與神的應許反對嗎?斷乎不是!若曾傳一個能叫人得生的律法,義就誠然本乎律法了。
-
和合本2010(上帝版-繁體)
這樣,律法是與上帝的應許對立嗎?絕對不是!如果律法的頒佈能使人得生命,義就誠然出於律法了。
-
和合本2010(神版-繁體)
這樣,律法是與神的應許對立嗎?絕對不是!如果律法的頒佈能使人得生命,義就誠然出於律法了。
-
當代譯本
這樣看來,上帝的律法和上帝的應許是否互相矛盾呢?當然不是!如果賜下的律法能帶給人生命,人就可以靠律法成為義人了。
-
聖經新譯本
這樣,律法和神的應許是對立的嗎?絕對不是。如果所賜下的律法能使人得生命,義就真的是出於律法了。
-
呂振中譯本
這樣,律法與應許相反麼?斷乎不是。假使有一個能使人活的律法曾經頒賜下來,稱義就真是由於律法了。
-
文理和合譯本
然則律與上帝之許相反乎、非也、若賜以能致生之律、則義誠由律矣、
-
文理委辦譯本
曰、律法與上帝之許相反乎、非也、若所賜之法、能使人生、則恃法可稱義矣、
-
施約瑟淺文理新舊約聖經
然則律法與天主之許相反乎、非也、若賜以能致生之律法、則人必由律法可得稱義、
-
吳經熊文理聖詠與新經全集
然則律法豈與恩諾相牴牾乎?無是理也。蓋所賜之律法、苟能予人以生命、則吾人所恃以成義者、誠在律法之中矣。
-
New International Version
Is the law, therefore, opposed to the promises of God? Absolutely not! For if a law had been given that could impart life, then righteousness would certainly have come by the law.
-
New International Reader's Version
So is the law opposed to God’s promises? Certainly not! What if a law had been given that could give life? Then people could become right with God by obeying the law.
-
English Standard Version
Is the law then contrary to the promises of God? Certainly not! For if a law had been given that could give life, then righteousness would indeed be by the law.
-
New Living Translation
Is there a conflict, then, between God’s law and God’s promises? Absolutely not! If the law could give us new life, we could be made right with God by obeying it.
-
Christian Standard Bible
Is the law therefore contrary to God’s promises? Absolutely not! For if the law had been granted with the ability to give life, then righteousness would certainly be on the basis of the law.
-
New American Standard Bible
Is the Law then contrary to the promises of God? Far from it! For if a law had been given that was able to impart life, then righteousness would indeed have been based on law.
-
New King James Version
Is the law then against the promises of God? Certainly not! For if there had been a law given which could have given life, truly righteousness would have been by the law.
-
American Standard Version
Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could make alive, verily righteousness would have been of the law.
-
Holman Christian Standard Bible
Is the law therefore contrary to God’s promises? Absolutely not! For if a law had been given that was able to give life, then righteousness would certainly be by the law.
-
King James Version
[ Is] the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.
-
New English Translation
Is the law therefore opposed to the promises of God? Absolutely not! For if a law had been given that was able to give life, then righteousness would certainly have come by the law.
-
World English Bible
Is the law then against the promises of God? Certainly not! For if there had been a law given which could make alive, most certainly righteousness would have been of the law.