1 Now some men came down from Judeasn That is, they came down from Judea to Antioch in Syria. and began to teach the brothers, “Unless you are circumcisedtc Codex Bezae (D) and a few other witnesses have “and walk” here (i.e., instead of τῷ ἔθει τῷ Μωϋσέως [tw eqei tw Mwu>sew"] they read καὶ τῷ ἔθει τῷ Μωϋσέως περιπατῆτε [kai tw eqei tw Mwu>sew" peripathte]). This is a decidedly stronger focus on obedience to the Law. As well, D expands vv. 1-5 in various places with the overall effect of being “more sympathetic to the local tradition of the church at Jerusalem” while the Alexandrian witnesses are more sympathetic to Paul (TCGNT 377). Codex D is well known for having a significantly longer text in Acts, but modern scholarship is generally of the opinion that the text of D expands on the original wording of Acts, with a theological viewpoint that especially puts Peter in a more authoritarian light. The expansion in these five verses is in keeping with that motif even though Peter is not explicitly in view.sn Unless you are circumcised. These teachers from Judea were teaching that Gentiles could not be saved unless they kept the law of Moses in regard to circumcision. Thus according to them a Gentile had first to become a proselyte to Judaism, including circumcision, before one could become a Christian. This party is sometimes known (collectively) as Judaizers. They did not question that Gentiles could come into the community, but disagreed with Paul and Barnabas on what basis they could do so. according to the custom of Moses, you cannot be saved.”

2 When Paul and Barnabas had a major argument and debatetn Grk “no little argument and debate” (an idiom). with them, the churchtn Grk “they”; the referent (the church, or the rest of the believers at Antioch) has been specified to avoid confusion with the Judaizers mentioned in the preceding clause. appointed Paul and Barnabas and some others from among them to go up to meet withtn Grk “go up to,” but in this context a meeting is implied. the apostles and elders in Jerusalemmap For location see Map5-B1; Map6-F3; Map7-E2; Map8-F2; Map10-B3; JP1-F4; JP2-F4; JP3-F4; JP4-F4. about this point of disagreement.tn Or “point of controversy.” It is unclear whether this event parallels Gal 2:1-10 or that Gal 2 fits with Acts 11:30. More than likely Gal 2:1-10 is to be related to Acts 11:30.

3 So they were sent on their way by the church, and as they passed through both Phoeniciasn Phoenicia was an area along the Mediterranean coast north of Palestine in ancient Syria. and Samaria, they were relating at lengthtn L&N 33.201 indicates that ἐκδιηγέομαι (ekdihgeomai) means to provide detailed information in a systematic manner, “to inform, to relate, to tell fully.” “Relating at length” conveys this effectively in the present context. the conversion of the Gentiles and bringing great joytn For ἐποίουν (epoioun) in this verse BDAG 839 s.v. ποιέω 2.c has “they brought joy to the members.” to all the brothers.

4 When they arrived in Jerusalem, they were receivedtn BDAG 761 s.v. παραδέχομαι 2 has “receive, accept” for the meaning here. by the church and the apostles and the elders, and they reportedtn Or “announced.” all the things God had done with them.tn “They reported all the things God had done with them” – an identical phrase occurs in Acts 14:27. God is always the agent.

5 But some from the religious party of the Phariseessn See the note on Pharisee in 5:34. who had believed stood up and said, “It is necessarysn The Greek word used here (δεῖ, dei) is a strong term that expresses divine necessity. The claim is that God commanded the circumcision of Gentiles. to circumcise the Gentilestn Grk “them”; the referent (the Gentiles) has been specified in the translation for clarity. and to order them to observetn Or “keep.” the law of Moses.”

6 Both the apostles and the elders met together to deliberatetn The translation for ἰδεῖν (idein) in this verse is given by BDAG 279-80 s.v. εἶδον 3 as “deliberate concerning this matter.” A contemporary idiom would be to “look into” a matter. about this matter.

7 After there had been much debate,tn Or “discussion.” This term is repeated from v. 2. Peter stood up and said to them, “Brothers, you know that some time agotn Or “long ago” (an idiom, literally “from ancient days”). According to L&N 67.26, “this reference to Peter having been chosen by God sometime before to bring the gospel to the Gentiles can hardly be regarded as a reference to ancient times, though some persons understand this to mean that God’s decision was made at the beginning of time. The usage of ἀφ᾿ ἡμερῶν ἀρχαίων is probably designed to emphasize the established nature of God’s decision for Peter to take the gospel to the Gentiles beginning with the centurion Cornelius. The fact that this was relatively early in the development of the church may also serve to explain the use of the idiom.” God chosesn God chose. The theme of God’s sovereign choice is an important point, because 1st century Jews believed Israel’s unique position and customs were a reflection of God’s choice. me to preach to the Gentiles so they would hear the messagetn Or “word.” of the gospeltn Or “of the good news.” and believe.tn Grk “God chose among you from my mouth the Gentiles to hear the message of the gospel and to believe.” The sense of this sentence in Greek is difficult to render in English. The Greek verb ἐκλέγομαι (eklegomai, “choose”) normally takes a person or thing as a direct object; in this verse the verb has neither clearly stated. The translation understands the phrase “from my mouth,” referring to Peter, as a description of both who God chose and the task to be done. This coupled with the following statement about Gentiles hearing the message of the gospel leads to the more dynamic rendering in the translation.

8 And God, who knows the heart,sn The expression who knows the heart means “who knows what people think.” has testifiedtn Or “has borne witness.” to them by giving them the Holy Spirit just as he did to us,sn By giving them…just as he did to us. The allusion is to the events of Acts 10-11, esp. 10:44-48 and Peter’s remarks in 11:15-18.

9 and he made no distinctiontn BDAG 231 s.v. διακρίνω 1.b lists this passage under the meaning “to conclude that there is a difference, make a distinction, differentiate.” between them and us, cleansingtn Or “purifying.” their hearts by faith.

10 So now why are you putting God to the testtn According to BDAG 793 s.v. πειράζω 2.c, “In Ac 15:10 the πειράζειν τὸν θεόν consists in the fact that after God’s will has been clearly made known through granting of the Spirit to the Gentiles (v. 8), some doubt and make trial to see whether God’s will really becomes operative.” All testing of God in Luke is negative: Luke 4:2; 11:16. by placing on the neck of the disciples a yokesn A yoke is a wooden bar or frame that joins two animals like oxen or horses so that they can pull a wagon, plow, etc. together. Here it is used figuratively of the restriction that some in the early church wanted to place on Gentile converts to Christianity of observing the law of Moses and having males circumcised. The yoke is a decidedly negative image: Matt 23:4, but cf. Matt 11:29-30. that neither our ancestorstn Or “forefathers”; Grk “fathers.” nor we have been able to bear?

11 On the contrary, we believe that we are saved throughtn Or “by.” the grace of the Lord Jesus, in the same way as they are.”tn Or “Jesus, just as they are.” BDAG 1016-17 s.v. τρόπος 1 translates καθ᾿ ὃν τρόπον (kaq’ Jon tropon) here as “in the same way as.”sn In the same way as they are. Here is an interesting reversal of the argument. Jews are saved by grace (without law), as Gentiles are.

12 The whole group kept quiettn BDAG 922 s.v. σιγάω 1.a lists this passage under the meaning “say nothing, keep still, keep silent.” and listened to Barnabas and Paul while they explained all the miraculous signstn Here in connection with τέρατα (terata) the miraculous nature of these signs is indicated. and wonders God had done among the Gentiles through them.

13 After they stopped speaking,tn BDAG 922 s.v. σιγάω 1.b lists this passage under the meaning “stop speaking, become silent.” James replied,tn Grk “answered, saying”; the redundant participle λέγων (legwn) has not been translated. “Brothers, listen to me.

14 Simeonsn Simeon is a form of the apostle Peter’s Aramaic name. James uses Peter’s “Jewish” name here. has explainedtn Or “reported,” “described.” how God first concerned himselftn BDAG 378 s.v. ἐπισκέπτομαι 3 translates this phrase in Acts 15:14, “God concerned himself about winning a people fr. among the nations.” to selecttn Grk “to take,” but in the sense of selecting or choosing (accompanied by the preposition ἐκ [ek] plus a genitive specifying the group selected from) see Heb 5:1; also BDAG 584 s.v. λαμβάνω 6. from among the Gentilessn In the Greek text the expression “from among the Gentiles” is in emphatic position. a people for his name.

15 Thetn Grk “And the.” Because of the difference between Greek style, which often begins sentences or clauses with “and,” and English style, which generally does not, καί (kai) has not been translated here. words of the prophets agreesn The term agree means “match” or “harmonize with.” James’ point in the introduction argues that many of the OT prophets taught this. He gives one example (which follows). with this, as it is written,

16 ‘After thistn Grk “After these things.” Isn The first person pronoun I refers to God and his activity. It is God who is doing this. will return,

17 so that the rest of humanitytn Or “so that all other people.” The use of this term follows Amos 9:11 LXX. may seek the Lord,

19 “Therefore I concludetn Or “I have decided,” “I think.” The verb κρίνω (krinw) has a far broader range of meaning than the often-used English verb “judge.” BDAG 568 s.v. κρίνω 3 places this use in Acts 15:19 in the category “judge, think, consider, look upon” followed by double accusative of object and predicate. However, many modern translations give the impression that a binding decision is being handed down by James: “it is my judgment” (NASB, NIV); “I have reached the decision” (NRSV). L&N 22.25, on the other hand, translate the phrase here “I think that we should not cause extra difficulty for those among the Gentiles.” This gives more the impression of an opinion than a binding decision. The resolution of this lies not so much in the lexical data as in how one conceives James’ role in the leadership of the Jerusalem church, plus the dynamics of the specific situation where the issue of Gentile inclusion in the church was being discussed. The major possibilities are: (1) James is handing down a binding decision to the rest of the church as the one who has ultimate authority to decide this matter; (2) James is offering his own personal opinion in the matter, which is not binding on the church; (3) James is voicing a consensus opinion of all the apostles and elders, although phrasing it as if it were his own; (4) James is making a suggestion to the rest of the leadership as to what course they should follow. In light of the difficulty in reconstructing the historical situation in detail, it is best to use a translation which maintains as many of the various options as possible. For this reason the translation “Therefore I conclude” has been used, leaving open the question whether in reaching this conclusion James is speaking only for himself or for the rest of the leadership. that we should not cause extra difficultytn Or “trouble.” This term is a NT hapax legomenon (BDAG 775 s.v. παρενοχλέω). for those among the Gentilestn Or “among the nations” (in Greek the word for “nation” and “Gentile” is the same). who are turning to God,

20 but that we should write them a lettertn The translation “to write a letter, to send a letter to” for ἐπιστέλλω (epistellw) is given in L&N 33.49. telling them to abstaintn Three of the four prohibitions deal with food (the first, third and fourth) while one prohibition deals with behavior (the second, refraining from sexual immorality). Since these occur in the order they do, the translation “abstain from” is used to cover both sorts of activity (eating food items, immoral behavior). sn Telling them to abstain. These restrictions are not on matters of salvation, but are given as acts of sensitivity to their Jewish brethren, as v. 21 makes clear. Another example of such sensitivity is seen in 1 Cor 10:14-11:1. from things defiledtn Or “polluted.” by idols and from sexual immorality and from what has been strangledsn What has been strangled. That is, to refrain from eating animals that had been killed without having the blood drained from them. According to the Mosaic law (Lev 17:13-14), Jews were forbidden to eat flesh with the blood still in it (note the following provision in Acts 15:20, and from blood). and from blood.

21 For Moses has had those who proclaim him in every town from ancient times,tn Grk “from generations of old”; the translation “fr. ancient times” is given by BDAG 192 s.v. γενεά 3.b. because he is read aloudtn The translation “read aloud” is used to indicate the actual practice; translating as “read” could be misunderstood to mean private, silent reading. in the synagoguessn See the note on synagogue in 6:9. every Sabbath.”

22 Then the apostles and elders, with the whole church, decidedtn BDAG 255 s.v. δοκέω 2.b.β lists this verse under the meaning “it seems best to me, I decide, I resolve.” to send men chosen from among them, Judas called Barsabbas and Silas,sn Silas. See 2 Cor 1:19; 1 Thess 1:1; 2 Thess 1:1 (= Silvanus). leaders among the brothers, to Antiochsn Antioch was a city in Syria (not Antioch in Pisidia).map For location see JP1-F2; JP2-F2; JP3-F2; JP4-F2. with Paul and Barnabas.

23 They sent this letter with them:tn Grk “writing by their hand” (an idiom for sending a letter).

24 Since we have heard that some have gone out from among us with no orders from us and have confusedtn Here BDAG 990-91 s.v. ταράσσω 2 states, “Of mental confusion caused by false teachings ταρ. τινά Ac 15:24 (w. λόγοις foll.).” you, upsettingtn BDAG 71 s.v. ἀνασκευάζω describes this verb with a figurative meaning: “to cause inward distress, upset, unsettle.” your mindstn Grk “souls.” by what they said,tn Grk “by words”; L&N 25.231 translates the phrase “they troubled and upset you by what they said.”

25 we have unanimouslytn Grk “having become of one mind, we have decided.” This has been translated “we have unanimously decided” to reduce the awkwardness in English. decidedtn BDAG 255 s.v. δοκέω 2.b.β lists this verse under the meaning “it seems best to me, I decide, I resolve.” to choose men to send to you along with our dear friends Barnabas and Paul,

26 whotn Grk “men who”; but this can be misleading because in English the referent could be understood to be the men sent along with Barnabas and Paul rather than Barnabas and Paul themselves. This option does not exist in the Greek original, however, since ἀνθρώποις (anqrwpoi") is dative and must agree with “Barnabas and Paul,” while ἄνδρας (andra") is accusative. By omitting the word “men” from the translation here, it is clear in English that the phrase refers to the immediately preceding nouns “Barnabas and Paul.” have risked their livestn Grk “who have risked their souls”; the equivalent English idiom is “risk one’s life.” The descriptions commend Barnabas and Paul as thoroughly trustworthy. for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ.tn Or “Messiah”; both “Christ” (Greek) and “Messiah” (Hebrew and Aramaic) mean “one who has been anointed.”

27 Therefore we are sendingtn This verb has been translated as an epistolary aorist. Judas and Silassn Judas and Silas were the “two witnesses” who would vouch for the truth of the recommendation. who will tell you these things themselves in person.tn Grk “by means of word” (an idiom for a verbal report).

28 For it seemed best to the Holy Spirit and to ustn This is the same expression translated “decided” in Acts 15:22, 25. BDAG 255 s.v. δοκέω 2.b.β lists “decide” as a possible gloss for this verse, and this translation would be consistent with the translation of the same expression in Acts 15:22, 25. However, the unusually awkward “the Holy Spirit and we have decided” would result. Given this approach, it would be more natural in English to say “We and the Holy Spirit have decided,” but changing the order removes the emphasis the Greek text gives to the Holy Spirit. Thus, although the similarity to the phrases in 15:22, 25 is obscured, it is better to use the alternate translation “it seems best to me” (also given by BDAG): “it seemed best to the Holy Spirit and to us.” Again the scope of agreement is highlighted. not to place any greater burden on you than these necessary rules:tn L&N 71.39 translates “indispensable (rules)” while BDAG 358 s.v. ἐπάναγκες has “the necessary things.”

29 that you abstain from meat that has been sacrificed to idolstn There is no specific semantic component in the Greek word εἰδωλόθυτος that means “meat” (see BDAG 280 s.v. εἰδωλόθυτος; L&N 5.15). The stem –θυτος means “sacrifice” (referring to an animal sacrificially killed) and thereby implies meat. and from blood and from what has been strangledtc Codex Bezae (D) and a few other witnesses lack the restriction “and from what has been strangled” (καὶ πνικτῶν, kai pniktwn), though the words are supported by a wide variety of early and important witnesses otherwise and should be considered authentic.sn What has been strangled. That is, to refrain from eating animals that had been killed without having the blood drained from them. According to the Mosaic law (Lev 17:13-14), Jews were forbidden to eat flesh with the blood still in it (note the preceding provision in this verse, and from blood). and from sexual immorality.tc Codex Bezae (D) as well as 323 614 945 1739 1891 sa and other witnesses have after “sexual immorality” the following statement: “And whatever you do not want to happen to yourselves, do not do to another/others.” By adding this negative form of the Golden Rule, these witnesses effectively change the Apostolic Decree from what might be regarded as ceremonial restrictions into more ethical demands. The issues here are quite complicated, and beyond the scope of this brief note. Suffice it to say that D and its allies here are almost surely an expansion and alteration of the original text of Acts. For an excellent discussion of the exegetical and textual issues, see TCGNT 379-83. If you keep yourselves from doing these things,tn Grk “from which things keeping yourselves.” Because of the length and complexity of the Greek sentence, the relative pronoun (ὧν, |wn) has been replaced by a pronoun (“these things”) and a new English sentence begun. The participle διατηροῦντες (diathrounte") has been translated as a conditional adverbial participle (“if you keep yourselves”). See further L&N 13.153. you will do well. Farewell.tn The phrase ἔρρωσθε (errwsqe) may be understood as a stock device indicating a letter is complete (“good-bye,” L&N 33.24) or as a sincere wish that the persons involved may fare well (“may you fare well,” L&N 23.133).

30 So when they were dismissed,tn Or “sent away.” they went down to Antioch,sn Antioch was a city in Syria (not Antioch in Pisidia). and after gathering the entire grouptn Or “congregation” (referring to the group of believers). together, they delivered the letter.

31 When they read it aloud,tn Grk “read it.” The translation “read aloud” is used to indicate the actual practice of public reading; translating as “read” could be misunderstood to mean private, silent, or individual reading. the peopletn Grk “they”; the referent (the people) is specified in the translation for clarity. rejoiced at its encouragement.tn Or “at its encouraging message.”

32 Both Judas and Silas, who were prophets themselves, encouraged and strengthened the brothers with a long speech.tn Here λόγου (logou) is singular. BDAG 599-600 s.v. λόγος 1.a.β has “in a long speech” for this phrase.

33 Aftertn Grk “And after.” Because of the difference between Greek style, which often begins sentences or clauses with “and,” and English style, which generally does not, καί (kai) has not been translated here. they had spent some time there,tn The word “there” is not in the Greek text, but is implied. they were sent off in peace by the brothers to those who had sent them.tc A few mss add 15:34 “But Silas decided to stay there.” Verse 34 is lacking in Ì74 א A B E Ψ Ï bo. It is included in a shorter form, with a few minor variations, by (C) 33 36 323 453 614 (945) 1175 1739 1891 al sa, and in a longer form (“But Silas decided to stay with them, and only Judas departed”) by D l. The verse is almost certainly not a part of the original text of Acts, but was added to harmonize with the statement about Silas in v. 40. The present translation follows NA27 in omitting the verse number, a procedure also followed by a number of other modern translations.

35 But Paul and Barnabas remained in Antioch,sn Antioch was a city in Syria (not Antioch in Pisidia). teaching and proclaiming (along with many others)sn This is a parenthetical note by the author. the word of the Lord.sn The word of the Lord is a technical expression in OT literature, often referring to a divine prophetic utterance (e.g., Gen 15:1, Isa 1:10, Jonah 1:1). In the NT it occurs 15 times: 3 times as ῥῆμα τοῦ κυρίου (rJhma tou kuriou; Luke 22:61, Acts 11:16, 1 Pet 1:25) and 12 times as λόγος τοῦ κυρίου (logo" tou kuriou; here and in v. 36; Acts 8:25; 13:44, 48, 49; 16:32; 19:10, 20; 1 Thess 1:8, 4:15; 2 Thess 3:1). As in the OT, this phrase focuses on the prophetic nature and divine origin of what has been said.

36 After some days Paul said to Barnabas, “Let’s returntn Grk “Returning let us visit.” The participle ἐπιστρέψαντες (epistreyante") has been translated as a finite verb due to requirements of contemporary English style. and visit the brothers in every town where we proclaimed the word of the Lordtn See the note on the phrase “word of the Lord” in v. 35. to see how they are doing.”tn BDAG 422 s.v. ἔχω 10.b has “how they are” for this phrase.

37 Barnabas wanted to bring John called Mark along with them too,

38 but Paul insistedtn BDAG 94 s.v. ἀξιόω 2.a has “he insisted (impf.) that they should not take him along” for this phrase. that they should not take along this one who had left them in Pamphyliasn Pamphylia was a province in the southern part of Asia Minor. See Acts 13:13, where it was mentioned previously. and had not accompanied them in the work.

39 They hadtn Grk “There happened a sharp disagreement.” The introductory phrase ἐγένετο (egeneto, “it happened that”), common in Luke (69 times) and Acts (54 times), is redundant in contemporary English and has not been translated. a sharp disagreement,tn BDAG 780 s.v. παροξυσμός 2 has “sharp disagreement” here; L&N 33.451 has “sharp argument, sharp difference of opinion.” so that they parted company. Barnabas took alongtn Grk “taking along Mark sailed.” The participle παραλαβόντα (paralabonta) has been translated as a finite verb due to requirements of contemporary English style. Mark and sailed away to Cyprus,sn Cyprus is a large island in the Mediterranean off the south coast of Asia Minor.

40 but Paul chose Silas and set out, commendedtn Or “committed.” BDAG 762 s.v. παραδίδωμι 2 gives “be commended by someone to the grace of the Lord” as the meaning for this phrase, although “give over” and “commit” are listed as alternatives for this category. to the grace of the Lord by the brothers and sisters.tn Grk “by the brothers.” Here it it is highly probable that the entire congregation is in view, not just men, so the translation “brothers and sisters” has been used for the plural ἀδελφῶν (adelfwn),.

41 He passed through Syria and Cilicia, strengtheningsn Strengthening. See Acts 14:22; 15:32; 18:23. the churches.