陶人豈無權於泥、由一團泥造一貴用之器、一賤用之器乎、

窑匠难道没有权柄从一团泥里拿一块做成贵重的器皿，又拿一块做成卑贱的器皿吗？

难道陶匠没有权从一团泥里拿一块做成贵重的器皿，又拿一块做成卑贱的器皿吗？

难道陶匠没有权从一团泥里拿一块做成贵重的器皿，又拿一块做成卑贱的器皿吗？

陶匠难道不可以从一团泥中拿一部分造贵重的器皿，又拿一部分造平凡的器皿吗？

陶匠难道没有权用同一团的泥，又做贵重的、又做卑贱的器皿吗？

难道陶匠没有权柄从同一团泥中，既造出贵重的器皿，又造出卑贱的器皿吗？

窰匠難道沒有權柄從一團泥裏拿一塊做成貴重的器皿，又拿一塊做成卑賤的器皿嗎？

難道陶匠沒有權從一團泥裏拿一塊做成貴重的器皿，又拿一塊做成卑賤的器皿嗎？

難道陶匠沒有權從一團泥裏拿一塊做成貴重的器皿，又拿一塊做成卑賤的器皿嗎？

陶匠難道不可以從一團泥中拿一部分造貴重的器皿，又拿一部分造平凡的器皿嗎？

陶匠難道沒有權用同一團的泥，又做貴重的、又做卑賤的器皿嗎？

窰匠對泥土難道沒有權柄從同一團泥作器皿，有的作成貴重的，有的作成下賤的麼？

難道陶匠沒有權柄從同一團泥中，既造出貴重的器皿，又造出卑賤的器皿嗎？

陶人豈無權於泥、由一團而造器、一為尊、一為卑乎、

泥豈非權在陶人、同一撮土而造之、或為器之貴、或為器之賤乎、

抑陶人於泥無自由處置之權、而不能於同一撮土中、製成貴賤不同之器耶？

Does not the potter have the right to make out of the same lump of clay some pottery for special purposes and some for common use?

Isn’t the potter free to make different kinds of pots out of the same lump of clay? Some are for special purposes. Others are for ordinary use.

Has the potter no right over the clay, to make out of the same lump one vessel for honorable use and another for dishonorable use?

When a potter makes jars out of clay, doesn’t he have a right to use the same lump of clay to make one jar for decoration and another to throw garbage into?

Or has the potter no right over the clay, to make from the same lump one piece of pottery for honor and another for dishonor?

Or does the potter not have a right over the clay, to make from the same lump one object for honorable use, and another for common use?

Does not the potter have power over the clay, from the same lump to make one vessel for honor and another for dishonor?

Or hath not the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel unto honor, and another unto dishonor?

Or has the potter no right over the clay, to make from the same lump one piece of pottery for honor and another for dishonor?

Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?

Has the potter no right to make from the same lump of clay one vessel for special use and another for ordinary use?

Or hasn’t the potter a right over the clay, from the same lump to make one part a vessel for honor, and another for dishonor?

主歟、主仍為我父、我儕為泥、主為陶人、皆為主手所造、

大室之中、不第有金器銀器、亦有木器瓦器、有為貴用、有為賤用者、人若潔己而去此可賤者、則為貴用之器、聖潔合乎主用、以備作種種善事、

主曰、爾往、彼乃我所選之器、以宣揚我名、在異邦人及君王並以色列民前、

凡主所造者、俱適其用、造惡人、日至以降罰、

子尚未生、未行善惡、而語利伯加云、長子必事幼子、以示天主選人之旨、非由行事、乃由召者、

我往陶人之室、陶人適轉輪製器、陶人所製之器壞矣、在其手又成為泥、遂以泥製他器、任其意之所欲、主諭我曰、告眾曰、主云、以色列族乎、我之待爾、豈不能如陶人乎、以色列族乎、爾於我手中、如泥於陶人手中、

倘若天主、雖欲彰其怒、並示其能、仍恆忍寛容可怒當滅之器、又將其榮之富有、顯示於蒙矜恤所預定以得榮之器、

如是、天主所欲矜恤者、則矜恤之、所欲使剛愎者、則使之剛愎、

斯人哥尼亞、豈已毀之瓦器、瓦器或作偶像為人所藐視乎、豈已棄之器皿、為人所不悅乎、彼及子孫、何為被驅逐驅逐原文作投至素未識之地、

以色列國被滅、滅原文作吞今斯民在異邦、視若無用之器、