Then the priest must examine the object again. If he finds that the contaminated area has not changed color after being washed, even if it did not spread, the object is defiled. It must be completely burned up, whether the contaminated spot is on the inside or outside.

洗过以后，祭司要察看，那物件若没有变色，灾病也没有消散，那物件就不洁净，是透重的灾病，无论正面反面，都要在火中焚烧。

洗过之后，祭司要检查，看哪，若那霉在他眼前没有变色，霉虽没有扩散，也是不洁净的。这是侵蚀性的灾病，无论是在正面或反面，都要用火焚烧那物件。

洗过之后，祭司要检查，看哪，若那霉在他眼前没有变色，霉虽没有扩散，也是不洁净的。这是侵蚀性的灾病，无论是在正面或反面，都要用火焚烧那物件。

之后，祭司要再次检查洗过的衣物，若发现霉斑原样未变，即使没有蔓延，那衣物也是不洁净的。无论衣物里面还是外面霉变，都必须把它烧掉。

洗净以后，祭司要察看；如果看见那病症没有转变，虽然没有蔓延，那物件仍是不洁净；要用火把它烧掉，因为里外都腐蚀了。

洗過以後，祭司要察看，那物件若沒有變色，災病也沒有消散，那物件就不潔淨，是透重的災病，無論正面反面，都要在火中焚燒。

洗過之後，祭司要檢查，看哪，若那霉在他眼前沒有變色，霉雖沒有擴散，也是不潔淨的。這是侵蝕性的災病，無論是在正面或反面，都要用火焚燒那物件。

洗過之後，祭司要檢查，看哪，若那霉在他眼前沒有變色，霉雖沒有擴散，也是不潔淨的。這是侵蝕性的災病，無論是在正面或反面，都要用火焚燒那物件。

之後，祭司要再次檢查洗過的衣物，若發現黴斑原樣未變，即使沒有蔓延，那衣物也是不潔淨的。無論衣物裡面，還是外面黴變，都必須把它燒掉。

洗淨以後，祭司要察看；如果看見那病症沒有轉變，雖然沒有蔓延，那物件仍是不潔淨；要用火把它燒掉，因為裡外都腐蝕了。

洗了以後，祭司要察看那災病；若見那災病並沒有變態；災病雖沒有發散，那物件還是不潔淨：那是有腐蝕性的災病；無論是反面的掉毛、是正面的掉毛、你總要將那物件放在火裏燒。

澣濯之後、必再察之、若其斑色猶未變、雖未蔓延、亦為不潔、乃屬霉毒之癩、無論在表在裏、必爇以火、

澣濯之後、必察之、其所染之疾、色猶未去、雖未蔓延、亦以為污、爇之以火、蓋衣之敝處、或於表裏、染癩甚深。

其後、祭司察已洗有斑之衣物、如斑色未變、雖斑未蔓延、亦為不潔、為透徹之霉斑、無論在表在裏、或作無論在前在後當焚之以火、

After the article has been washed, the priest is to examine it again, and if the mold has not changed its appearance, even though it has not spread, it is unclean. Burn it, no matter which side of the fabric has been spoiled.

After the thing with the mold on it has been washed, the priest must look at it again carefully. Suppose the way the mold looks has not changed. Then even though the mold has not spread, it is‘ unclean.’ Burn it. It does not matter which side of the thing the mold is on.

And the priest shall examine the diseased thing after it has been washed. And if the appearance of the diseased area has not changed, though the disease has not spread, it is unclean. You shall burn it in the fire, whether the rot is on the back or on the front.

After it has been washed, the priest is to reexamine the contamination. If the appearance of the contaminated article has not changed, it is unclean. Even though the contamination has not spread, you must burn the fabric. It is a fungus on the front or back of the fabric.

After the article with the mark has been washed, the priest shall again look, and if the mark has not changed its appearance, even if the mark has not spread, it is unclean; you shall burn it in the fire, whether an eating away has produced bareness on the back or on the front of it.

Then the priest shall examine the plague after it has been washed; and indeed if the plague has not changed its color, though the plague has not spread, it is unclean, and you shall burn it in the fire; it continues eating away, whether the damage is outside or inside.

and the priest shall look, after that the plague is washed; and, behold, if the plague have not changed its color, and the plague be not spread, it is unclean; thou shalt burn it in the fire: it is a fret, whether the bareness be within or without.

After it has been washed, the priest is to reexamine the contamination. If the appearance of the contaminated article has not changed, it is unclean. Even though the contamination has not spread, you must burn up the fabric. It is a fungus on the front or back of the fabric.

And the priest shall look on the plague, after that it is washed: and, behold,[ if] the plague have not changed his colour, and the plague be not spread; it[ is] unclean; thou shalt burn it in the fire; it[ is] fret inward,[ whether] it[ be] bare within or without.

The priest must then examine it after the infection has been washed out, and if the infection has not changed its appearance even though the infection has not spread, it is unclean. You must burn it up in the fire. It is a fungus, whether on the back side or front side of the article.

Then the priest shall examine it, after the plague is washed; and behold, if the plague hasn’t changed its color, and the plague hasn’t spread, it is unclean; you shall burn it in the fire. It is a mildewed spot, whether the bareness is inside or outside.

For it is impossible to bring back to repentance those who were once enlightened— those who have experienced the good things of heaven and shared in the Holy Spirit,who have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the power of the age to come—and who then turn away from God. It is impossible to bring such people back to repentance; by rejecting the Son of God, they themselves are nailing him to the cross once again and holding him up to public shame.When the ground soaks up the falling rain and bears a good crop for the farmer, it has God’s blessing.But if a field bears thorns and thistles, it is useless. The farmer will soon condemn that field and burn it.

And when people escape from the wickedness of the world by knowing our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ and then get tangled up and enslaved by sin again, they are worse off than before.It would be better if they had never known the way to righteousness than to know it and then reject the command they were given to live a holy life.They prove the truth of this proverb:“ A dog returns to its vomit.” And another says,“ A washed pig returns to the mud.”

But those who fail to develop in this way are shortsighted or blind, forgetting that they have been cleansed from their old sins.

Your impurity is your lewdness and the corruption of your idolatry. I tried to cleanse you, but you refused. So now you will remain in your filth until my fury against you has been satisfied.