我回覆他們，無論甚麼人，被告還沒有和原告當面對質，沒有機會為所控告的事申辯，就先定他罪的，這不是羅馬人的規矩。

我对他们说，无论什么人，被告还没有和原告对质，未得机会分诉所告他的事，就先定他的罪，这不是罗马人的条例。

我回覆他们，无论什么人，被告还没有和原告当面对质，没有机会为所控告的事申辩，就先定他罪的，这不是罗马人的规矩。

我回覆他们，无论什么人，被告还没有和原告当面对质，没有机会为所控告的事申辩，就先定他罪的，这不是罗马人的规矩。

我告诉他们，按照罗马人的规矩，被告还没有跟原告对质和自辩之前，不能定他的罪。

我答覆他们说，被告还没有和原告当面对证，又没有机会为所控的罪申辩，就被送给对方，罗马人没有这个规例。

我回答他们：在被告还没有与原告当面对质，并且对被控罪名还没有获得申辩机会以前，就把被告交出去，这不符合罗马人的规矩。

我對他們說，無論甚麼人，被告還沒有和原告對質，未得機會分訴所告他的事，就先定他的罪，這不是羅馬人的條例。

我回覆他們，無論甚麼人，被告還沒有和原告當面對質，沒有機會為所控告的事申辯，就先定他罪的，這不是羅馬人的規矩。

我告訴他們，按照羅馬人的規矩，被告還沒有跟原告對質和自辯之前，不能定他的罪。

我答覆他們說，被告還沒有和原告當面對證，又沒有機會為所控的罪申辯，就被送給對方，羅馬人沒有這個規例。

我回答他們說：「無論甚麼人，被告還沒有和原告當面對質，對案情還沒有得分訴之餘地，徇人情把他定罪，這不是羅馬人的規矩。」

我回答他們：在被告還沒有與原告當面對質，並且對被控罪名還沒有獲得申辯機會以前，就把被告交出去，這不符合羅馬人的規矩。

我應之曰、被訟者、未與訟者面質、申訴其事、即置之死、非羅馬人例也、

余曰、被訟之人、未得與訟者質證、以訴己事、即致之罪、非羅馬人例也、

我曰、被訟之人、尚未與訟者對質、未得機會、以訴己事、即定其死罪、非羅瑪人例也、

予答曰：「無論何人、兩造尚未對質、且對於所控之事、未獲答辯即先定罪、羅馬人無此慣例。」

“ I told them that it is not the Roman custom to hand over anyone before they have faced their accusers and have had an opportunity to defend themselves against the charges.

“ I told them that this is not the way Romans do things. We don’t judge people before they have faced those bringing charges against them. They must have a chance to argue against the charges for themselves.

I answered them that it was not the custom of the Romans to give up anyone before the accused met the accusers face to face and had opportunity to make his defense concerning the charge laid against him.

I pointed out to them that Roman law does not convict people without a trial. They must be given an opportunity to confront their accusers and defend themselves.

I answered them that it is not the Roman custom to give someone up before the accused faces the accusers and has an opportunity for a defense against the charges.

I replied to them that it is not the custom of the Romans to hand over any person before the accused meets his accusers face to face, and has an opportunity to make his defense against the charges.

To them I answered,‘ It is not the custom of the Romans to deliver any man to destruction before the accused meets the accusers face to face, and has opportunity to answer for himself concerning the charge against him.’

To whom I answered, that it is not the custom of the Romans to give up any man, before that the accused have the accusers face to face, and have had opportunity to make his defence concerning the matter laid against him.

I answered them that it’s not the Romans’ custom to give any man up before the accused confronts the accusers face to face and has an opportunity to give a defense concerning the charges.

To whom I answered, It is not the manner of the Romans to deliver any man to die, before that he which is accused have the accusers face to face, and have licence to answer for himself concerning the crime laid against him.

I answered them that it was not the custom of the Romans to hand over anyone before the accused had met his accusers face to face and had been given an opportunity to make a defense against the accusation.

I answered them that it is not the custom of the Romans to give up any man to destruction before the accused has met the accusers face to face and has had opportunity to make his defense concerning the matter laid against him.

非斯都就回答：「保羅押在凱撒利亞，我自己快要往那裏去。」他又說：「所以，你們中間有權的人與我一同下去，那人若有甚麼不是，就讓他們控告他。」

「不先聽本人的口供，查明他所做的事，難道我們的律法還定他的罪嗎？」

後來有人把要害他的計謀告訴我，我立刻把他解到你那裏去，又命令告他的人在你面前告他。」

亞基帕對保羅說：「准你為自己申訴。」於是保羅伸手辯護說：

有人告訴你，你也聽見了，就要細心探聽。看哪，是真的，確實有這可憎的事在以色列中發生，

這兩個爭訟的人就要站在耶和華面前，和當時的祭司與審判官面前，審判官要細心調查。看哪，證人作的是偽證，要用偽證陷害弟兄，

先訴情由的，似乎有理；另一人來到，就察出實情。

未聽完就回話的，就是他的愚昧和羞辱。